|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Member No.: 1
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lewisville, TX
Posts: 12,940
Vehicle Info: Ride:2003 Mustang GT Vert
Nickname:Rattletrap
Transmission:4R70W
Induction:ATI P1SC
iTrader Rating: (9)
|
Carburetor and EFI versions for $309
http://www.edelbrock.com/media/news/...ve/091407.html Code:
You must be logged in to view this content.
_____________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Senior Member
![]() Member No.: 1
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lewisville, TX
Posts: 12,940
Vehicle Info: Ride:2003 Mustang GT Vert
Nickname:Rattletrap
Transmission:4R70W
Induction:ATI P1SC
iTrader Rating: (9)
|
Quote:
on paper, it's supposed to show some gains in the mid range and upper rpm range. it's a 100% aluminum intake and will be much more durable than the plastic oem's in regards to nitrous use. edelbrock has always made good products. the victor jr. for the 5.0 is one of the best intakes in the business. their reputation alone suggests that this should be a good product. however, i read that the current 4.6 aftermarket intakes make sacrifices on the bottom end for improvements on the top end. that has always made me a bit leery considering how inherently week the 4.6 2v is in the torque department. that would be beneficial at the track, but be detrimental for around town driving.
_____________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Blown... Motor
Member No.: 121
Join Date: Jul 2007
Age:24 Location: panama City Fl
Posts: 2,434
Vehicle Info: Ride:2003 Mustang GT
Nickname:Marilyn
Transmission:Manual t-3650
Induction:N/A
iTrader Rating: (1)
|
i agree about the topend peformance part.. and the thing about the victor jr with the 5.0s is the fact its a topend and hurts in the lowend and well now they have it for the 4.6 that hurts enough as is.. but hey we dont have much to choose from
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
|
From a racing stand point, the air gap is great for high horse power motors.
I played with several intakes, Edelbrock Proformer and RPM proformer are both good low end. I ran the torquer 2 intake and it gave me very good mid and top end. I did try the Stealth intake but lost ET and MPH. It's all about how much money you want to spend. For the money I would go with the Torquer 2 for over all performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Blown... Motor
Member No.: 121
Join Date: Jul 2007
Age:24 Location: panama City Fl
Posts: 2,434
Vehicle Info: Ride:2003 Mustang GT
Nickname:Marilyn
Transmission:Manual t-3650
Induction:N/A
iTrader Rating: (1)
|
yeah the torquer 2 is a very intresting intake but at the same time from what ive heard/read its still a high rev intake... but its not that bad..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Member No.: 30
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 610
Vehicle Info: Ride:200/Ford/Mustang
Nickname:Beeeocheeee.
Transmission:T-56, 6 speed
Induction:Paxton Novi 2000
iTrader Rating: (0)
|
I don't think it will be good for a street due to the RPM range. For track and high boost car may be. It's kind of like the Ricard Racing intake, I don't know if you re-call. The RR intake was good for Turbo and S/C at high RPM range. at low rpm, it's useless. The price's still good though.
_____________________________
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |